History of The Celts

  THE PRE-CELTIC WORLD 

The Celts left no written record of their early history. The first written mention of them came from their Mediterranean neighbors. To the Greeks, they were known as the Keltoi. Around the year 500 BC, Hecataeus wrote of the trading center Massilia (Marseilles) as being located in the land of the Ligurians, near the land of the Celts. He also mentions a Celtic town in Austria in the present day province of Styria.  

Herodotus (ca 484-420BC?) also refers to the Celts at a slightly later date, mentioning in his work, The Histories, that the source of theDanube lay in the land of the Celts. He located the Celts as occupying the lands to the West and North of the Mediterranean, beyond the Pillars of Hercules, the Straits of Gibraltar, in the Danube region, and behind Marseilles. In other words, the Celts were already in the Iberian Peninsula, Aquitaine, and north of the Alps - a sizable portion of Europe. What he didn't know was that they had recently reached Britain, which is known to have had Celtic habitation by 500 BC.       (It wasn't until c. 350 that Celts crossed to Ireland.)
Hecataeus and Herodotus were writing at a time when the Celts were just reaching the first identifiable stage of their history - an era known to archaeologists as "The Hallstatt Culture," which we will explore in a later essay. Neither author found it necessary to explain to their audience who the Celts were. Presumably, the existence and name of these northern barbarians were already known to the more civilized Greeks.

Who were the Celts and where did they come from? To find the answers we have to go back into pre-history and examine the archaeological remains of the tribes which populated early Europe during the late Stone Age and into the Bronze Age. In her book The Celts, Nora Chadwich traces the threads which lead down through millennia of pre-history to the emergence of the Celts as a recognizable people.

The first inhabitants of Europe were Paleolithic and Mesolithic hunter/gatherers who moved north as the Quartenary Ice Age retreated. By the 9th millennium BC, even such northern regions as Denmark, Northern Britain, and the Baltic area had been penetrated. Several origins are cited for these people, but, whether they came from Eurasia, or the Iberian Peninsula, or North Africa, as the early centuries passed, they became intermingled, thus removing the chance of any pure racial stocks. These people became the source from which all subsequent European population groups were derived. Any later arrivals were absorbed in the same manner over time, further mixing the racial potpourri.

In about the 9th millennium BC, agriculture began to emerge in the Middle East. By the 6th millennium, pressed by a growing population, the agriculturists were beginning to migrate to the west and north looking for fertile land to cultivate and supplanting, absorbing, or converting the earlier hunter/gatherers to an agricultural or pastoral way of life. The agriculturists grew cereal crops; the pastoral groups herded cattle and swine; some groups engaged in both activities to varying degrees.

Following the river valleys, these farming groups reached central Europe during the 5th millennium, where they found rich loess soil which was easy to cultivate with the simple tools and methods in use at that time. The pace of migration and resettling accelerated, particularly in the fertile valleys of the Danube and the Rhine. Nearly all of Europe, including Britain and Ireland, were resettled during this era. In most areas, the settlers found very productive soil, and the bounty it produced made two other developments possible. First, as farming techniques became adapted to the seasonal climate of temperate Europe, the people found themselves more secure in their food supply than they had previously been; and, secondly, they found themselves with more leisure time. This in turn created the right circumstances for further advances in technology and social organization.

Switching for a moment back to the Middle East, where control of the food supply had already reached higher efficiencies, it is possible to see the cultural consequences of increased technology and leisure. The first of the great civilizations of the world sprang up among the Sumarians of the Tigris-Euphrates Valley in about 3200 BC. Egyptian civilization followed shortly thereafter, beginning in 3100 BC. By 2500 BC, the Egyptians were building the Pyramids. The Minoan civilization of Crete came into being at about the same time. All of these early civilizations were founded on an agricultural economy, and all of them developed similar institutions, some of which proved to be the tragic flaws leading to their demise.

In the temperate zones of Europe, nothing so dramatic was going on at this time. Nevertheless, the European agriculturists were moving toward something resembling civilization, although it was still hundreds of years away.

Archaeologists classify pre-historic populations by the artifacts they left behind and by the types of inhumation (burial) they practiced. We are concerned here with two groups in particular as being the earliest forerunners of
the Celts.
THE BEAKER PEOPLE

The first group is the Beaker People who get their name from one characteristic artifact commonly found in their graves, a Bell Beaker, which was a drinking vessel formed of clay. They are found in most areas of Europe, but they seem to have been concentrated in Iberia and Central Europe North of the Alps around the latter part of the 3rd millennium BC. They appear to be one of the earliest warrior aristocracies in Europe, which is inferred from the grave goods buried with their chieftains, which include archery equipment with flint tipped arrows and a stone arm bracer to withstand the rebound of the bow string. For this reason, they are sometimes referred to as "The Archer People." The significance of this has to do with the type of agriculture that was practiced. Neolithic farmers had no knowledge of fertilization techniques. Soil was worked until it was depleted, and then the tribe had to move on to find new land. At the same time, the population was increasing dramatically, adding to the competition for land. As the various tribal elements bumped up against each other, enmity between neighboring groups occurred, and this led to the emergence of tribal leaders to organize defense and to lead forays in search of new territory. Late Neolithic settlements show some evidence of the construction of defenses around their perimeter. By this stage, livestock had become an important addition to the food supply and a measure of wealth. It became increasingly important to protect this vital resource from raiding parties within confined and defensible positions.

One other item is found in the graves of the Beaker People, and it is an object that speaks volumes about the centuries ahead and the changes that were about to occur. The item in question is a small metal dagger. The early Bronze Age was around the corner. In fact, it had already started in the civilized world.

It shouldn't be assumed that the late Neolithic people of temperate Europe were totally isolated from the more advanced peoples of the Middle East and Mediterranean. On the contrary, there is evidence of trade and contact throughout the Neolithic period between the trans-Alpine Europeans and the civilizations of the Mediterranean rim. With the coming of the Bronze Age, commerce between the two regions accelerated dramatically. Northern and Western Europe had something the more developed societies to the South and East needed - copper and tin, the basic raw materials for the production of bronze. The primitive tribes had it in abundance in some areas, whereas the civilized areas had very little of it. We'll come back to this point shortly as it played an important role in the development of early European culture.


THE BATTLE-AXE PEOPLE

A second precursor group to the Celts emerges late in the 3rd Millennium BC in Central Europe. They are identified by their practice of burying their dead individually, with grave goods, in a circular barrow or earthen mound (tumulus) enclosed with a timber mortuary house. This method of burial has been traced to the Pontic Steppes of Southern Russia. Thus, these later settlers came into Central Europe via migration across the Steppes, bringing new ideas and practices with them. They appear to have introduced the first metal axe-heads of a distinctive shape with a hole for mounting the handle. This is the origin of the name assigned to them by archaeologists - The Battle-Axe people. It is believed that they in turn were influenced by a people living north of the Caucasus in the area of the lower Knieper and the Kuban and Terek rivers, near present day Kiev, where the raw materials for making copper were plentiful. From the same trans-Caucasus people, the Battle-Axe tribes seemed to have adopted a more grandiose and war-like lifestyle than their new neighbors in Europe. The Beaker People adopted this new style of axe; however, they copied it in stone, as the raw materials and techniques for making copper had not yet arrived. The Battle-Axe folk had outrun their supply line. Thus, among the grave goods of the two peoples, many more examples of stone axe heads are found than copper ones.

The Battle-Axe culture carried another important development into Europe. For the first time, horse bones are found in grave sites from this period. The species of horse is the tarpan, a small Eurasian breed that would have been more useful as a pack animal than as a mount for riding. The riding horse evolved somewhat later through selective breeding and better feeding. The point is, here we find the horse domesticated for the first time in pre-history.

This brings us to the point where language can be addressed. There is still some debate as to how and when the Indo-European tongue arrived in Europe. Some philologists claim that Indo-European based language was already established throughout the entire continent, including Britain and Ireland, at the time of the above events. Others claim that it came in with the Battle-Axe people. Since Indo-European has been traced to its roots in an area north of the Black Sea, it seems reasonable to suppose that the
Battle-Axe people, by virtue of the contiguity of their original home lands, carried it from the Steppes into Europe. The Battle-Axe tribes fused very quickly with the Beaker People and spread rapidly to all corners of the continent. Wherever they went, their customs and their language prevailed over that of the Beaker folk.

As mentioned above, the early Bronze Age coincided with the arrival of the Battle-Axe culture in Central Europe. The Bronze Age was well underway in the higher civilizations to the south and east at this time, but trans-Alpine Europe was brought quickly into the picture by virtue of having, in some areas, a large supply of the basic materials - especially tin - for the production of bronze. Copper and tin were relatively rare in the very
regions where metallurgic technology had emerged.
The European tribal groups controlling the areas where the raw materials were available quickly and greatly benefited from trade. The importation of new tools improved agriculture; new weapons enhanced offensive and defensive warfare; new utensils and ornaments improved the quality of life. The impact of this on the entire population is difficult to gauge, but it certainly would have
established a new bench mark in material culture. The influx of material goods from the Mediterranean was part of it. The other part was the transference of technology and ideas to the more primitive areas. Before long, the ore producing regions had their own artisans, whether local or imported. In time, Bronze age societies sprang up from Central Europe
through Western Europe and into Britain. The metal workers of this time represented the first sign of specialization to emerge in a society where all hands had previously been turned to the production of food and shelter.

Whether it was due to differences in climate or temperament, the Bronze Age societies of Europe developed, not as extensions of Middle Eastern or Mediterranean cultures, but as uniquely European. It was the beginning of a distinctly European culture, a development that was central to the emergence of
the Celts.
  Home                                       Back